Priority
When determining a request/issues priority there can be multiple facets of the impact. Below is a guideline.
Meaning | Functionality | Affected Users | Performance Degradation |
---|---|---|---|
Highest | Unusable feature with no workaround, user is blocked | Impacts 50% or more of users | Degradation is currently happening |
High | Broken Feature, workaround too complex & unacceptable | Impacts between 25%-50% of users | Degradation is guaranteed to occur in the near future |
Medium | Broken feature with an acceptable workaround | Impacts up to 25% of users | Degradation is likely to occur in the near future |
Low | Broken non-critical feature | Impacts less than 5% of users | Degradation is likely to occur but no timeframe |
Lowest | Functionality inconvenience or cosmetic issue | Usually impacts only a single user | Degradation may occur but it's not likely |
If a request seems to fall between two priority levels, assign it to the higher-priority label.
Below you’ll find some example scenarios and how the prioritization MythCoders would assign to them.
Highest
Data corruption/loss.
Security breach.
Unable to process orders or add items to a shopping cart.
Customers are unable to log in to their account.
High
Guests on a reservation are unable to make changes but the host can.
Customers are unable to process their orders on mobile devices but able to on desktops.
Emails are being sent out to the wrong recipients or with incorrect data.
Medium
Customers are unable to cancel orders but hosts or admins can.
Customers encounter an error during their request, but the request is completed successfully.
Emails aren’t being sent out to customers.
Low
New gift cards can’t be purchased.
The photo gallery is broken.
Unable to upload images.
Reports are not able to run successfully.
Lowest
Label colors are incorrect.
Button elements are not fully aligned.
Last updated